Imam Ali
The writer, Dr Hasnain Gulamali Walji (Texas, USA), is the Head of the Khoja Heritage Project of The World Federation of KSIMC. A lifelong educator and historian, he has dedicated over three decades to documenting the rich, socio-religious journey of the Khoja Shia Ithna-Asheri community. His landmark documentary, The Khojas – A Journey of Faith, traces this evolution across 600 years. Over the past 30 years, he has been collecting care Gujarati and Khoja history books housed at the Mulla Asghar Memorial Library in Toronto, which he co-founded with Raza-Aly Hiridjee.
Serving for almost half a century, he had been the former Secretary General, Vice President, and President of The World Federation. Professionally, he is a nutritionist and has also authored 26 books on naturopathic medicine, translated into several languages. As Executive Director of the United Global Initiative and a Trustee of the Jaffer Family Foundation, he leads the CodeGirls project, which empowers underprivileged girls to pursue technology careers. He has also been instrumental in facilitating the ‘Ashura at Harvard’ study track at Harvard Divinity School, promoting academic discourse on Shi’ism, fully funded through the Jaffer Family Foundation.
History is often shaped by leaders who mastered power.
But it is remembered by leaders who mastered principle.
Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib stands among the rare few who refused to bend either to elite privilege or to popular pressure. His leadership represents a model that is at once morally compelling and politically difficult. He did not govern to win applause. He governed to establish justice.
And justice, as history repeatedly shows, is rarely the easiest path.
Much of what we understand about Imam Ali’s philosophy of governance emerges through Nahjul Balagha, the celebrated collection of sermons, letters, and sayings compiled by al-Sharif al-Radi in the 10th century. While individual narrations have been discussed with varying degrees of authentication across Islamic scholarly traditions, the text remains one of the most influential works on ethics, leadership, justice, and spirituality in Islamic civilization.
The Reluctant Acceptance of Khilafat
After the assassination of Caliph Uthman in 656 CE, Medina descended into uncertainty. Political authority fractured. Competing factions emerged. Many turned to Imam Ali as the only figure with moral authority to restore stability.
But Imam Ali hesitated.
He warned the people:
“Leave me and seek someone else. We are facing a matter that has many faces and colors… The hearts cannot stand it, and the minds cannot remain firm upon it.”
(Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 92)
This was not reluctance born of fear.
It was clarity.
He knew justice would disrupt entrenched interests.
He knew reform would provoke resistance.
Eventually, he accepted the caliphate, but on one condition: he would govern according to justice, not political compromise.
And almost immediately, the test began.
Justice Before Stability
When Imam Ali accepted leadership, advisors urged caution.
Retain powerful governors.
Stabilize first. Reform later.
This is how politics usually works.
Compromise today.
Justice tomorrow.
Imam Ali reversed the formula.
Justice first.
Stability later.
He declared:
“By Allah, I shall restore rights to their rightful owners even if I find them spent in marriage or divided among women.”
(Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 15)
Justice was not negotiable.
And immediately, resistance began.
The Muawiya Challenge: Justice vs Political Stability
One of Imam Ali’s first decisions was to dismiss governors appointed during the previous administration, including Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan, the powerful governor of Syria.
Muawiya had built a formidable political base in Damascus. He controlled a disciplined army and enjoyed strong regional loyalty. Many advisors urged Imam Ali to retain him temporarily.
Their argument was practical.
Keep Muawiya in place.
Stabilize authority.
Reform later.
It was politically sound advice.
Imam Ali refused.
He believed that retaining governors associated with contested policies and accusations of favoritism for the sake of political convenience would undermine justice itself.
Muawiya refused to step down. Instead, he demanded that Imam Ali punish those responsible for Uthman’s assassination before recognizing his authority.
The disagreement escalated.
It led to the Battle of Siffin.
The Arbitration and the Birth of the Kharijites
During the Battle of Siffin, Muawiya’s forces raised copies of the Qur’an on their lances, calling for arbitration.
Imam Ali reportedly viewed the call for arbitration as a political tactic designed to halt the momentum of battle. But divisions within his own army forced him to accept arbitration.
This decision created a new crisis.
A faction within Imam Ali’s army rejected arbitration entirely. They declared:
“No judgment except God’s.”
They became known as the Kharijites.
Ironically, many of them had pressured him to accept arbitration in the first place.
Now they accused him of compromise.
They withdrew and later turned violent.
Yet Imam Ali showed extraordinary restraint.
He allowed dissent.
He granted rights.
He avoided confrontation.
Historical reports describe Imam Ali telling the Kharijites:
“You have three rights over us: we will not prevent you from attending the mosques, we will not withhold your share from the treasury, and we will not fight you unless you begin violence.”
Only when the Kharijites began attacking civilians did Imam Ali confront them.
This led to the Battle of Nahrawan.
Even then, he warned:
“Do not fight the Kharijites after me. Whoever seeks the truth and errs is not like one who seeks falsehood and attains it.”
(Nahjul Balagha, Saying 61)
He distinguished between dissent and extremism.
Few leaders manage one.
Imam Ali managed both.
More from this Writer
Latest posts
- Justice Before Power: Imam Ali and the Burden of Principled Leadership – Part 1
Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib stands among the rare few who refused to bend either to elite privilege or to popular pressure. His leadership represents a model that is at once morally compelling and politically difficult. He did not govern to win applause. He governed to establish justice. - Loving and Mastering Math
Loving and Mastering Math by Murtaza Akber Hameer If you ask many students in primary school and high school what they think of Math, they will say it’s hard. In fact, for many their test and exam scores will reflect their sentiments. But is Math really that hard? More harder than Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Business and Economics? - Empty Treasury, Full Justice
Empty Treasury, Full Justice by Mohamedarif Mohamed Suleman In many societies, leadership slowly mutates into a claim on privilege. The title itself begins to mean access: access to better stipends, to closed doors, to a standard of living sealed off from the people being led. The ruler’s house grows taller, his table richer, his distance wider, and this is called authority. For Imam Ali (AS), that equation was upside down. To him, authority was not entitlement but burden, and the first sign that a government had lost its way was when its leaders lived beyond the means of the masses while guarding the public purse as if it were their own.
Writers Panel | A Simple Thought | Obituaries | Ziarat Ashura | Islamic Calendar | Facebook | Instagram
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.